|
|
A look at the financial impacts of the
Sharon Hills Project
There are costs associated with Brickstone's Sharon Hills that
were not accounted for in the alleged $3.2 million benefit
promised by Brickstone and Town officials. Mitigation offered
by Brickstone is also far less than promised. Some of the
liabilities that the developer did not include in revenue
projections are examined below.
School Costs
The Brickstone project will result in the need for 69
additional units of affordable housing, adding approximately 121
children to the school system. The developer repeatedly stated
that the senior living facility would draw approximately 16% of
its elderly occupants from the Town of Sharon.
More ….. |
Integrity In Government Is
Indispensible
Here are some highlights from the recent decision from the
District Attorney (DA) regarding the violation of the Open
Meeting Law by the Sharon Selectmen:
The DA stated, “This Office has found that the Selectmen
violated the Open Meeting Law dozens of times by meeting in
closed session to discuss the Brickstone Development.”
The town’s attorney, Mr. Gelerman, wrote several letters
attempting to explain why breaking the law didn’t occur. The
DA’s decision rejected these explanations.
This is the third time since 2001 that the DA’s office cited the
Sharon Selectmen for breaking the Open Meeting Law.
The DA stated, “Using closed sessions to discuss how options
could be kept from the public is contrary to the letter and
spirit of the Open Meeting Law.”
The DA stated that the Selectmen should publicly acknowledge the
DA’s finding that their “closed sessions regarding the
Brickstone Development were a significant violation of the Open
Meeting Law.”
More ….. |
Over 55 Housing Glut
The Boston Globe article entitled “The age of broken promises” (http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/30/the_age_of_broken_promises/?page=1
) discusses the glut of housing for people over 55 in
Massachusetts and the problems this is causing the developers,
the towns, and the residents of the age-restricted housing. The
article states that “developers in .....[other towns] and
Sharon, are saying that age restrictions, formerly a hot
marketing tool, are now hampering sales.” The Globe also notes
that – “Under Massachusetts law, local cities and towns cannot
mandate zoning conditions that prevent sales.” As you may
recall, NADD argued that the glut of elderly housing in the
state might result in Brickstone ultimately asking for relief
from the age restriction at Sharon Hills. This article gives
even more support to that contention. Below is an excerpt from
a presentation at town meeting in November, 2007 regarding the
housing glut:
The current senior housing glut in Massachusetts could impact
the tax revenues Sharon receives from this proposed project.
CHAPA is particularly worried about this issue as they promote
residential building. Therefore, they commissioned a
comprehensive study in 2005 regarding age-restricted housing
which includes Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs),
the type of project Brickstone is proposing.
More ….. |
Traffic Issues - The developer and
town officials stated that traffic impacts would be minimal.
Our response: Traffic reports prepared by the
developer were inaccurate, and severely underestimated the
impacts to residents. The traffic study prepared by the
developer was incomplete. Specifically, the developer stated,
and the Selectmen parroted, that the traffic associated with the
proposed development would be similar, if not better than,
traffic generated by 88-single family homes. In fact, during
Town Meeting, Selectmen Chair William Heitin stated that 88
single family homes would result in more traffic than the
proposed rezoning (personal observation from watching tape of
Town Meeting). These statements are directly contrary to the
Town’s own consultant’s report, which states that the
alternative of 88 single family homes would result in weekday
morning peak vehicles of 72, and evening number of vehicles of
96, while the proposed senior living would result in morning
peak of 111 vehicles, and an evening peak of 126 vehicles.
More..... |
|